Thursday, October 18, 2007

"Lets play that racist card!"

A cry-baby article by Jody Rave for the North County Times. One responding reader puts it very well:

" Every time a particular group in this country wants special privileges and gets resistance, they cry foul in the form of racism. Enough is enough. There is no racism against native americans in the year 2007..... If the native american community cant seem to understand that not every surrounding american community wants a casino in their midst, then feel free to move to one of your sister tribes lands and live near their casino."


Tribes rallying to overcome racism
By: JODI RAVE - For the North County Times

TEMECULA ---- Tribally owned casinos are often the only bridge between Native and non-Native communities.

But too many times, roadblocks on that bridge can leave tribes in the crosshairs of the dominant culture.
"When they clash, it often has to do with issues associated over gaming," said Marsha Kelly, a communications consultant in Minneapolis.
Kelly led a panel discussion ---- "Overcoming Racism in Your Indian Gaming Customers and Their Communities" ---- recently at an Indian gaming marketing conference at the Pechanga Resort and Casino near San Diego.
The conference was preceded by a media seminar in which I was a speaker and panelist.
Racial contempt toward Natives can be fueled when Native families appear to be benefiting from casino profits, Kelly said.
Anthony R. Pico, former chairman for the Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians, provided opening remarks for the Native Voices media seminar.
Poor Natives definitely outnumber rich ones, he said. And more than 70 percent of tribal gaming revenue comes from just 15 percent of all tribal casinos.
He asked this question: "How do you suspect we are perceived by non-Indians?"
"Are we regarded as the first Americans, a culturally rich people with a long and storied history? Or are we perceived as often portrayed in the media, as wealthy purveyors of casino gambling, using our riches to bully our way through Congress and state legislatures?"
Pico quoted Billy Frank Jr., a treaty-rights activist and elder of the Nisqually Nation: "Our people are beginning to be identified as casino Indians and not as the people of the land or of the salmon. Casinos help economically, but they are not who we are. We are our languages. We are our culture. We are our natural resources. We are our spirituality and we are our prayers."
Congress passed the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act in 1988. A common misperception is the act opened the door to gaming in Indian Country when, in fact, the door to gambling had always been open. Tribes around the country have traditionally practiced games of chance.
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Seminole Tribe of Florida's right to run high-stakes bingo in 1981. And the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed tribes' right to casinos in the landmark 1987 case, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians.
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which was pushed by states, sought to gain federal and state control over Indian gaming. In the days since, tribal casinos have become burgeoning money-makers for a handful of tribes, tilting annual casino revenues to near $26 billion in 2006, up from $206 million in 1988, according to an Analysis Group industry report.
Tribal casinos around the country have also provided a half-million jobs on, off and near reservations.
"We've just completed a decade during which per capita income for Native Americans grew by more than 30 percent," Pico said.
"Where's the celebration? Where are the accolades? Why are our Native governments derogatorily referred to by the media as 'cash-rich' Indian tribes? Who is perpetuating this myth of the rich Indian when 25 percent of our people live below the poverty line?"
Pico criticized politicians for putting all of their time and effort into a fight to limit tribal gaming instead of supporting critical Native issues, such as housing, education, drug abuse and health care.
About two-thirds of the U.S. Native population relies on the underfunded Indian Health Service for medical needs.
"Policymakers at the federal and state level will never address the needs of Native America or treat American Indians with the respect and protocol deserved of sovereign nations as long as there is a false perception of who we are."
Kelly suggested Native communities tackle stereotypes and defuse misperceptions head-on. Most people have ideas about Natives that aren't grounded in reality, she said.
"And some of those attitudes can be pretty racist."
She said research on racism and Native people is nearly nonexistent.
"The best way to overcome these attitudes is for people to begin thinking about tribal members as friends and thinking about the tribe as so important to the community that if they hurt them, they hurt themselves."


3 comments:

Unknown said...

"Our people are beginning to be identified as casino Indians and not as the people of the land or of the salmon. Casinos help economically, but they are not who we are. We are our languages. We are our culture. We are our natural resources. We are our spirituality and we are our prayers."

Seems to me if you dont want to be identified by why you do THEN DONT DO IT. You ARE your casinos, and frankly the amount of actual indian blood in any of these people, it is likely that most cannot really be considered indian. So if its not your nature, or your blood, the perhaps you are simply Casino Operators and owners. I would say your indian ancestors would be turning in their graves.. if they were actually your ancestors.

sosumi said...

Hi SMP and thanks for commenting. You bring up a valid point, that of how little real indian blood is involved, it also begs the question.. how can it be construed as racism?

Meeerkat said...

"Casinos help economically, but they are not who we are..."
What a joke. Give me one example how casinos help our economy. They are nothing but a social and economical drain on our society. We as tax payers haven't even seen the tip of the iceberg. These new compacts were supposed to bring in 500 million for the state. I believe these new compacts will cost us taxpayers at least 3 times that amount in social costs. Is California prepared to take this irreversible step? I don't think we can afford it.